🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an international accord created to protect females from abuse, covering family violence, following prolonged and heated discussions in the legislature.

Several thousand of demonstrators gathered in Riga this past week to oppose the decision. The final decision now lies with President the nation's president, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last year, mandating governments to establish laws and assistance programs to end all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey pulled out in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a significant regression for gender equality.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its focus on equal rights undermines family values and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Saeima, lawmakers voted 56 to 32 to exit from the convention, a action sponsored by political opponents but supported by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the main political groups advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has urged citizens to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official urged the agreement not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent vote has provoked widespread protest both within Latvia and abroad.

22,000 individuals have signed a Latvian petition demanding the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for next Thursday, charging MPs of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Possible Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a hasty choice driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for female equality and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey left the convention in 2021, instances of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the head of state could potentially send back the legislation for additional review if he has concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to legal requirements, "considering governmental and judicial factors, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a concerning situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," commented a rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been rising in multiple EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular legal protections for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could affect comparable debates in other EU countries